| CAR HIRE | CAR INSURANCE | CARS FOR SALE | CAR BREAKERS | CLASSIC CARS | CAR CLUBS | ESTATE AGENTS | TRAVEL AGENTS | MOTORING LINKS |
Tuning
The 1800cc MGB
There
are few mysteries about the engine employed in the MGB.
During the era in which the B Series
engine was designed, hydraulic lifters for automotive applications were still
in their technological infancy, therefore the engine was designed to use solid
lifters. This offered the designers the opportunity to wisely leave the
camshaft exposed to the crankcase so that its lobes could be lubricated by a
spray of oil emitting from the lower ends of the connecting rods. This
desire to lubricate the lobes of the camshaft and the lower sections of the
tappets dictated the thickness of the connecting rod big end. Adequate
bearing support was achieved by using a large diameter big end design.
Its Heron-type head used Weslake-patented
combustion chambers which were a marked advance beyond previous technology,
allowing for superior flow characteristics while permitting excellent flame
propagation. The incoming fuel/air charge was directed toward the spark
plug and away from the hot exhaust valve, minimizing preignition and allowing
less ignition advance to be used. The siamesed intake ports, like some
other features of the engine, were largely the result of production economics.
By using siamesed intake ports the intake manifold could be of simple
design and thus be inexpensive to produce. The tappets and pushrods could
also be neatly situated between the ports, thus keeping the head as narrow and
light as possible. The placement of the intake and exhaust manifolds on the
same side of the head meant that only one mating surface need be machined, and
fewer manifold mounting studs and their attendant threaded bores were required.
It also allowed the distributor and generator to be placed on the opposite
side of the engine, thus greatly simplifying maintenance.
There are also some distinct engineering
advantages to this approach. By placing the intake ports with their cool
fuel/air charge next to the hotter exhaust ports, this area of the head is better
cooled than it would be in a crossflow design, precluding warpage and possibly
extending the life of the exhaust valves, although this configuration allows
more heat to accumulate in the walls of the intake ports and thus is detrimental
to intake charge density and hence lowers power output potential. The
small-bore long-stroke configuration gives better thermal efficiency and thus
better fuel economy. The bore centers are the same as those on the earlier,
smaller displacement versions of the engine, so the new engine could be produced
on much the same tooling, thus keeping costs within reason.
Although the B Series engine design
is truly a compromise, it's a brilliant one that modern mechanics recognize
as one that was far ahead of its time when introduced. It was further
improved with the introduction of its 5 main bearing version. A higher
capacity Holbourne-Eaton oil pump was provided to supply the bearings which
were 1 1/8" wide for the front, center, and rear bearings, and 7/8"
wide for the intermediate bearings. They all had diameters of 2.125", a
full 1/8" greater than that of the previous 1622cc three main bearing version.
This produced an almost unbreakable crankshaft with lots of overlap between
its journals and counterweights. Certainly there were other new engine
designs that were even more advanced in the mid-to-late 1940s, but this one
was intended to be available in cars that ordinary people could afford to own
and operate. In those days, that made it special, and its designers had
every reason to be proud. During an era when full race engines struggled
to reliably produce 1HP per cubic inch, when the 18G Series arrived in 1962
it boasted 95HP from a mere 110 cu. in., giving it a specific output of .864hp
per cu. in., and this was an engine that could reliably be used as a daily driver!
In its heyday, it was impressive indeed. Pretty fantastic for a
relic whose design is well over a half century old! A true classic engine
for a true classic car!
Everybody who is about to rebuild
their tired engine entertains the thought of improving upon the power output
of this classic engine design. However, nobody wants to end up with a
temperamental beast. Since you're rebuilding the engine, this is a good
opportunity to do it the Peter Burgess way. As a former professional mechanic
who has built custom engines, I can assure you that I have thoroughly read both
of Mr. Burgess' books "How to Power Tune MGB 4-Cylinder Engines" and
"How To Build, Modify, And Power Tune Cylinder Heads," and that his
theories are both sound and logical. His reputation as the MGB engine
tuner is well deserved. His books should be in every MGB owner's library.
His website can be found at http://www.mgcars.org.uk/peterburgess/ . If
you have not studied his books, they are available from Veloce Publishing at
http://www.veloce.co.uk/newtitle.htm . I wholeheartedly agree with his
statement "The entire engine system needs to be considered as a whole,
otherwise the gains from component changes may not be fully realized."
Before you begin, you will need to
have a proper Service Manual. I would recommend that you purchase a reprint
of the original factory service manual that the MG dealers had for their mechanics
to consult. To my knowledge there is nothing that can compare with it
for completeness. Its actual title is "The Complete Official MGB,"
although it is often called "The Bentley Manual" as it is printed
by Bentley Publishers. They have a website at http://www.bentleypublisher.com/
where you can order it direct.
If your engine is a post-1967 North
American Market model, then it is equipped with an antipollution system. To
get better performance out of the engine, it will be necessary to remove some
of the components of this system. Prior to doing this, check with your
State Officials to find out if this is illegal. Be advised that in some
states where it is illegal to tamper with a vehicle's antipollution system it
is not required to be maintained once a car has reached a certain age, so specifically
inquire about this issue as well. Be aware that it is desirable to retain
certain items of this system, so don't start by simply stripping everything
off. Instead, proceed with the same methodical approach that you would
use toward any other part of the car.
If yours is a 1964 through 1969 GA
through GF Series engine equipped with a PCV Valve, it should be retained to
reduce atmospheric pressure inside the engine. However, if the compression
rings start to fail, oil mist from the engine will saturate the oil separator
tube of the early version of the front tappet chest cover and be transferred
into the combustion chambers through the induction system, the consequent carbon
buildup eventually resulting in problems such as preignition, sometimes called
"pinging." The front tappet chest cover from the later 18V engines
(18V-797-AE, 18V-798-AE, 18V-801-AE, 18V-802-AE, 18V-883-AE-L, 18V-884-AE-L,
18V-890-AE-L, 18V-891-AE-L) is preferable due to its better breathing characteristics
and for having incorporated into its cover design an oil reservoir/return chamber
which minimizes the transfer of oil mist into the induction system. When
replacing the gaskets on the tappet chest covers, use sealant to glue the gaskets
to the covers and allow it to harden overnight so that the gasket will not move
during installation.
If you choose to not remove the hose
that leads from the Gulp Valve to the fitting on the center of the intake manifold,
it can be simply blocked with a plug, or, after removing the intake manifold,
threads can be tapped into the intake manifold with a 1/4" NPT tap and
a nipple installed.
At this point you may remove both
the hoses and the Check Valve that connect the Air Pump to the Air Injectors
atop the head. Next, remove the Air Pump, its air cleaner, and the attendant
mounting brackets. When the engine is equipped with the Air Pump, the
Gulp Valve is necessary to prevent backfiring when closing the throttle at high
engine speeds, so remove the Gulp Valve along with its hoses and its attendant
hardware as well. At idle the intake manifold vacuum is in the order of
18 to 20 Hg, while on the overrun it rises to 23 to 25 in Hg without the Gulp
Valve. This is not enough to make a significant difference in terms of the amount
of fuel pulled out of the jet, thus the Gulp Valve is unnecessary once the Air
Pump is removed. Next, remove the Air Injectors and replace them with
7/16"-20 fine threaded bolts 3/4" in length. Do not be tempted
to use Allen head plugs because they will have to be bottomed out into the head,
projecting into and thus creating an obstruction to air flow in the exhaust
ports. Finally, if your engine is from a post-1974 model, remove the EGR Valve
and its hose and control pipe, the fuel shutoff valve, and the vacuum advance
valve.
You should retain the Anti-Run-On Valve
fitted on the 1973 and later models as its purpose is to apply such a strong
vacuum to the chamber above the fuel in the float bowls that the fuel cannot
exit the fuel jets when the ignition is switched off, thus preventing the car
from running on. When the ignition is turned off the ignition switch energizes
this solenoid-actuated valve to close it, then the oil pressure switch releases
it after the engine has stopped and oil pressure has fallen. When the
engine is running the Anti-Run-On valve is open, allowing fresh air to be pulled
through the adsorption canister, clearing it of the vapors that have expanded
into it from the fuel tank and the carburetor float bowl chambers, then through
the rocker arm cover and tappet chest into the induction system to be consumed
in the combustion chambers. The rocker arm cover is equipped with a restrictor
tube to prevent the fresh air being drawn in from overly diluting the fuel/air
mixture and causing lean running. This Anti-Run-On system can be readily
retrofitted onto 1970 through 1971 18GJ and 18GK engines as well as the 1972
18V-584-Z-L and 18V-585-Z-L engines, all of which have the necessarily modified
fuel tank, adsorption canister, non-vented oil and fuel filler caps, and restrictor
tube equipped rocker arm cover as standard equipment. Do not remove or
disconnect the Vapor Separator that connects the fuel tank to the Adsorption
Canister.
It is important to retain the crankcase
ventilation system. Properly maintained, crankcase gases are drawn into
the combustion chambers of the engine by the vacuum created by the fuel induction
system, either through the intake manifold as in the 18GB through 18GF engines,
or through the carburetors as in the later engines. This permits the crankcase
to function in a partial vacuum which causes oil mist inside the crankcase to
be drawn upwards towards the camshaft and tappets. Without the partial
vacuum provided by this system, the pressurized gases inside the crankcase of
the B Series engine would cause oil to be blown past the pistons into the combustion
chambers leading to carbon buildup and consequent preignition problems. In
addition, an excess of these pressurized gases and oil mist would also be vented
partially through its rocker arm cover, pressurizing the adsorption canister
and interfering with its function, rather than traveling down through the pushrod
passages as they should to aid in the lubrication of the lower ball ends of
the pushrods and the upper sections of the tappets. For the excess pressurized
gases in the crankcase to arrive at the rocker arm cover they would have to
travel up the past the pushrods. This means that the gases would be forced
upward around the tappets, depriving their upper sections of the additional
lubrication supplied by the oil mist and the oil running down the pushrods from
the rocker arm assembly. It thus must be understood that all of this is
prevented by drawing all of the pressurized gases inside the engine out through
the tappet chest cover and into the induction system under vacuum, and as such
the system contributes to a prolonged engine lifespan. These procedures
having been performed, you can now set out on a quest for more power.
You must accept the fact that more
power will increase both wear and stress on your engine's components. Hence
it is important that the basic components of the engine provide a sound foundation.
Remember: if anything is worth doing, it's worth doing right. Have
all of your components, including the crankshaft, block, heads, connecting rods,
and rocker arms hot tanked to remove the years of accumulated crud that is to
be found in all old engines. Prior to this being done insist that all
of the gallery/core/frieze plugs be removed. Remove the aluminum Engine
Number Tag from the block prior to hot tanking as the caustic chemicals will
dissolve it. After hot tanking, all of the internal passages should be
chased out thoroughly with brushes and flushed. Be sure to
tell your machinist that the area inside of your block around the rear cylinder
is commonly a trap for sediment and to be sure that all of it is removed. All
threads in the block should be chased with a tap and all holes should be reamed.
Also insist that new oversize bronze plugs be shrink-fitted slightly beneath
the surface of the block so that they won't interfere with proper gasket sealing
of the sump and end plates. Bronze has a higher coefficient of expansion
and contraction than iron. To "shrink-fit" them into the block,
put them into a ziplock bag, turn the thermostat all the way down on your deep
freeze, and leave them in there overnight. That "shrinks" them
to a smaller diameter. When you're ready to install them, take them out,
spray them with WD-40 to displace any moisture on them, then seat them into
the block with a flat-nosed punch. When they warm to room temperature,
they'll be in there good and tight because they've expanded! The only
way to get them out is to drill and tap threads into them and use a puller!
Because bronze expands more than iron when it gets hot, there's no way
that they'll ever come out while driving down the road. Stainless steel
Frieze plugs should be used for the same reason. Their high chromium content
also means lots of expansion when hot, so they won't pop out, either. Make
sure that they have a good concentric seating surface by specifying that an
end mill bit be used to clean up their seating surfaces in the block. Not
the cheap way to do it, but it always works.
Never reuse old gaskets, seals, oil
gallery plugs, frieze plugs, core plugs, bushings, bearings, valve springs,
shims, thrust washers, piston rings, circlips, wrist pins, rocker bracket studs,
rocker shafts, head mounting studs, manifold studs, connecting rod bushings,
connecting rod bolts, or the main bearing cap studs and/or nuts. None
of these items are expensive, and recycling them into your engine is not only
false economy, but an open invitation to future mechanical failure.
Be sure that all bearing support surfaces
are line-reamed and their oiling holes carefully deburred. If possible,
it would be wise to have the rocker arms, heads, block, crankshaft, and connecting
rods magnafluxed or, better yet, x-rayed to be certain that there are no cracks.
All of the rocker arm faces should be resurfaced on a contour grinder
and rehardened if they are not to be replaced by new ones.
Warped mating surfaces are the major contributing
factor in leakage and in the development of cracks in the head casting. While
today’s sealants are excellent and today’s gaskets possess greater compressibility
than those of the past, they can compensate for warped mating surfaces only
to a very limited degree. Use a Payen or Fel-Pro head gasket or one that
is marked FRONT/TOP as these should be quality gaskets. These gaskets
are resin-impregnated, have copper sealing rings, and require no additional
sealing coatings. The resin softens when it gets hot and makes a better
seal. They are particularly appropriate for use on engines that have been
converted to aluminum heads as they handle the differing coefficients of expansion
between a cast iron block and an aluminum head quite well. Do not allow
the gasket to overhang into the bore of the cylinder as this will lead to a
blown gasket and/or internal damage to the engine. You will need to retorque
the cylinder head immediately after the initial running of the engine.
During the course of an engine rebuild it’s
common to find that the block is warped along its longitudinal axis, so we’re
always prepared to line-bore the main bearing and camshaft journals. However,
we rarely stop to consider that this warpage should also extend to the mating
surfaces elsewhere on the engine. The necessity of skimming them flat
just as one would the deck of the block and the mating surface of the head should
always be explored. To check for warpage in your garage, simply clean
the mating surfaces and smear a very thin stain of machinist's bluing or petroleum
jelly on them. In a smooth, perpendicular motion, place a clean plate
glass or a mirror on the surface and then gently pull it away. Hold it
up to a light and look for any gaps in the bluing/petroleum jelly outline. If
you find any, you’ve got warpage. This technique will work with any mating
surface. Get the mating surfaces flat and you’ll have gone a long way
towards having an oil-tight engine.
Paint the engine before reassembly
with a thermoconductive enamel engine paint only. Hirsch has an excellent
engine enamel which, being unique in that it was originally formulated for use
on jet engines, will withstand temperatures up to F 600 and is an exact duplicate
of the shade of red ("MG Maroon") used on the 18G through 18GK Series
engines. It remains glossy almost indefinitely and can be applied directly
to cast iron without primer. Hirsch has a website at http://www.hirschauto.com/
. Do not allow paint to get onto any gasket mounting surfaces or into
any threaded holes. Do not paint the front face of the engine rear engine
plate where it mates up with the gasket to the back of the engine block. Also,
do not paint the area of the rear engine plate where the starter motor mounts,
because the starter needs a solid electrical ground in order to work properly.
Instead, these gasket areas should be masked off prior to painting. Once
the masking is applied to the surface, place the component onto the plate and
scribe around it with an Exacto knife, then simply peel away the masking from
the area to be painted.
The most desirable engine blocks for a high
output engine are the early 18V blocks of the 1972 through 1974 Chrome Bumper
models. These later blocks have bolts instead of studs for securing their
stronger main bearing caps. These can be readily identified by their engine
numbers: 18V-584-Z-L and 18V-585-Z-L from the 1972 model year, and 18V672-Z-L
and 18V-673-Z-L from the 1973 through 1974 model years. These later main
bearing caps have shallow recesses for the heads of their mounting bolts while
the earlier caps have deeper recesses for their washers and nuts. The
later main bearing caps can be used in the earlier engines only if their appropriate
mounting bolts are also used and only if they are line-bored.
Be aware that the later 18V blocks
from the 1975 through 1980 Rubber Bumper models have a repositioned motor mount
boss on the camshaft side of the block and so will not fit into earlier cars.
These can be readily identified by their engine numbers: 18V-836-Z-L,
18V-837-AE-L, 18V797-AE-L, 18V-798-AE-L, 18V-801-AE-L, 18V-802-AE-L, 18V-883-AE-L,
18V-884-AE-L, 18V-890-AE-L, 18V-891-AE-L, 18V-892-AE-L, and 18V-893-AE-L.
The crankshaft with the best balance
and wear characteristics is the flat-sided five-main-bearing cast iron version
found in the early 18V engines (18V-584-Z-L, 18V-585-Z-L, 18V-672-Z-L, and 18V-673-Z-L).
Although slightly weaker than the alternate steel crankshafts used in
five-main-bearing engines and seven pounds heavier than the earlier three-main-bearing
steel crankshafts (32 lbs Vs 25 lbs), it is strong enough for the streetable
enhanced-performance engine that is the goal of this article. Advise your machinist
that the crankshaft main bearing caps and the connecting rod end caps are individually
matched paired sets and hence are not interchangeable. Following this,
the crankshaft should be indexed and the lengths of its throws matched. Be
sure to tell the machinist that you want the journals radiused at the web to
reduce the chances of breakage under heavy loadings. Check both ends of
the crankshaft for any grooves worn into it by the old seals. If they
cannot be polished out by your machinist, then a Speedi-Sleeve will be necessary
(Moss Motors Part# 520-515). Moss Motors has a website at http://www.mossmotors.com/
.
This having been done, the effective
length of the connecting rods (eye center-to-eye center distance) should be
matched. If possible, have the connecting rods balanced end-for-end. Have
both the piston/ring/wristpin assemblies and the connecting rod assemblies matched
respectively to within .10 of a gram. Pistons that use only three rings
are lighter than the older-design four-ring and obsolete five-ring designs.
The reciprocating masses having thus been matched, the crankshaft and
the flywheel should then be dynamically balanced separately. Advise the
machinist that you would prefer that the balance of the crankshaft be achieved
by wedging rather than by drilling. These procedures are fundamental to
producing the smoothest running engine possible and will provide a bit more
power that would otherwise be lost to the production of vibration, in some engines
perhaps as much as 3 HP. Lightening the flywheel to a minimum weight of
16 lbs will cause the engine to pick up and lose RPM faster with the clutch
disengaged and thus enable faster shifting, although at the price of increased
vibration and a tendency for the engine to stall due to decreased flywheel inertia.
Should you choose to have this done, advise the machinist that the material
to be removed should be taken from the front and back faces and not from the
clutch friction surface.
Electropolishing and shot-peening
of the connecting rods is necessary only if you're going racing. Note
that exotic lightweight connecting rods such as those marketed by Carillo (590
grams) are primarily intended for racing use and are unnecessary for use in
all but the most radical of street engines, although their lower reciprocating
mass will reduce both horsepower loss and vibration. The obliquely split
connecting rods first used in the three main bearing 18G and 18GA engines used
a smaller-diameter (.750") wristpin. Both it and the obliquely split
connecting rod of the five main bearing engine (18GB through early 18GH Series)
weighed in at a ponderous 980 grams. Not only are they heavy, they are
notoriously weak in highly stressed engines. The horizontally split connecting
rods with balance pads used in the late 18GH through early 18V engines were
a lighter 845 grams. The final version of the connecting rod used in the
late 18V engines had no balance pads and were the lightest, weighing 760 grams.
These can commonly be found on engines whose identification numbers start
with 18V-883-AE-L, 18V-884-AE-L, 18V-890-AE-L, 18V-891-AE-L, 18V-892-AE-L, or
18V-893-AE-L. Be aware that the connecting rods used on the 18GB through
18GF engines use connecting rods that used the larger 13/16" wristpins
that floated in a press fitted bushing in the small end of the connecting rod.
This bushing was later eliminated in those of the 18GH through 18V engines.
These later engines also used the larger 13/16" (.8125") diameter
wristpins which were press fitted into the connecting rods, so your pistons
must be chosen accordingly. However, the small end of the later connecting
rods can be machined to accept the earlier bushing if floating pistons are desired.
If you desire lighter connecting rods to further reduce vibration and
its attendant power loss, the late Original Equipment ones without the balance
pads found on the late 18V engines will fit this requirement at minimal cost.
When installed, the oil squirt holes
of the connecting rods must face the side of the engine opposite the camshaft
to cool the piston and lubricate the load bearing surfaces during the power
stroke. Failure to do this will eventually result in extreme piston pin
wear within the piston itself, plus create the very real likelihood of piston
failure, not to mention increased bore wear as well. Positioning the connecting
rods so that the oil squirt holes face the camshaft is not necessary as the
camshaft receives excellent lubrication from both the pressure galleries in
which its journals spin plus residual oil flowing down the pushrod bores from
the rocker arm assembles, as well as oil sprayed from the crankshaft's main
bearings and connecting rod big end bearings at the crankshaft. Be aware
that on some connecting rod bolts, only one side of the bolt head is chamfered
to provide sufficient clearance for the camshaft, so note this fact when you
reassemble them.
Aside from matching the weights of
the reciprocating components and dynamic balancing of the crankshaft and the
flywheel, perhaps one of the best ways to create a smooth engine is to equalize
the compression and thus the power impulses occurring in each cylinder. Once
the crankshaft and the connecting rods have been indexed, this can be accomplished
by making sure that the combustion chambers are of equal volume so that the
compression ratio in each cylinder will be the same. The volume of each
combustion chamber can be measured after the head has been skimmed flat by using
a clear piece of sheet plastic with a small hole drilled in it. Simply
put a bead of chilled grease around the edge of a combustion chamber and press
the plastic down onto it so that the grease forms a seal. Using a syringe
or an eyedropper with a scale of measurement on it, carefully fill each combustion
chamber with light oil, keeping a record of how much is necessary to fill each
one. Next, use a Dremel tool to gently remove small amounts of metal from
the smallest combustion chamber. Work slowly. The walls of the combustion
chamber should be kept perpendicular to its roof to ensure the best flow characteristics.
The roof should be flat and finished with a sanding disc, care being taken
to not undercut or groove the base of the wall where it adjoins the roof. Take
care that in an attempt to unshroud the intake valve you do not attempt to remove
too much material from the combustion chamber wall near it as this can lead
to preignition and breaking into a coolant passage. Unshrouding is best
left to experts. Instead, remove material evenly from the roof of the
combustion chamber. Measure the volume of the combustion chamber repeatedly
until it matches that of the largest one. Repeat this process on all of
the combustion chambers until their volumes all match. You should now
have equal compression on all four cylinders, making for a smoother engine.
Be sure that both the mating surface
of the head and the deck of the block have been skimmed flat and that the stud
mounting holes are chamfered, or at best you'll ultimately experience a blown
head gasket or at worst a cracked head. Flycutting lacks precision and
should be used only as a cost-cutting measure for removing metal prior to the
final precision cut. An end mill produces a superior finish for street
machines, the grooves left behind by the end mill providing a surface that the
head gaskets can bite into and thus produce a better seal. After milling,
the ridges at the edges of the grooves left on surface of the deck of the block
by the machining process should be removed. Surface grinding is good for
racing engines that use only copper head gaskets and face frequent disassembly.
Note that the deck of the block must be parallel to the axis of the crankshaft.
The Original Equipment specification piston crown to deck depth is .040".
It may be necessary to shim the rocker
stands after the head has been skimmed so that standard-length pushrods can
be used. If so, be careful to maintain the original symmetry of the thrusts
of the opposing ends of the rocker. The edges of the combustion chamber
and the valve seat recesses must be carefully deburred and smoothed to preclude
the possibility of "hot spots" developing and thus prevent preignition
from consequently developing.
While all of the connecting rods used
in the B Series engine use the same
center-to-center length (6.500”) to produce a connecting rod to stroke ratio
of 1.86:1, they differ greatly in design details. Connecting rods from
the 18GB through the 18GF Series all use floating wrist (gudgeon) pins that
ride in small end bushings and are retained by circlips, while those of the
18GK and 18V Series use press-fitted wrist (gudgeon) pins, although the wrist
(gudgeon) pins are of the same diameter (.8125"). These press-fitted
pins typically require a 3 to 5 ton press to install. Prior to installation
the ends of the pins should be checked to be sure that they have been lightly
chamfered to prevent them from damaging their bores in the piston. The
safest installation technique is to chill the pins in a deepfreeze overnight
to cause the metal to contract to a smaller diameter and to boil the pistons
in water to cause the bore into which the pins fit to expand just prior to pressing
in the chilled pins. Although the pistons themselves are interchangeable
between the five-main-bearing engines due to their identical small end and big
end bearing sizes, they must be installed complete with their appropriate connecting
rods and wrist (gudgeon) pins. Pistons of the three-main-bearing 18G and
18GA Series engines used wrist pins of .7500” diameter and as such cannot be
used in the connecting rods of the later five-main-bearing engines
Because
of the B Series engine's relatively short connecting rod to stroke ratio of
1.86:1, the engineers at MG insisted on forgoing the use of the usual split
skirt Lo-ex piston normally installed in other versions of the B Series engine
intended for use in the more sedate family sedans and instead chose to specify
solid skirted pistons to minimize the effects of the greater side thrust loadings
resulting from the higher engine speeds attainable with dual carburetors, thus
gauranteeing reliability. The Original Equipment Hepolite pistons are
of excellent quality and need not be superseded by specialty racing pistons.
They also have the distinct advantage of having their oversize number
impressed upon the forward part of their crowns to ease reassembly. These
are available from Advanced Performance Technologies. They have a website
at http://www.aptfast.com/ . Prior to boring the block each piston should
be measured with a micrometer to establish its optimum bore size. They
should be fitted to a clearance tolerance of .003” to .0035”. Because
of the close proximity to the bore of the studs, the bores of the cylinders
tend to distort slightly when the head is torqued down. Some machinists
will try to compensate for this by sizing the bores to their maximum factory-specified
clearance, but this will result in a shorter piston and bore life. The
proper approach is to mount a blanking plate to the deck of the block and torque
it to the same specifications as would be used when mounting the head in order
to simulate the stress of a torqued head, then bore the cylinders. The
top of the bore should be then be chamfered to reduce the development of "hot
spots" that are precursors of preignition and to allow easier installation
of the piston/ring assemblies. When using a hone to crosshatch the cylinder
bore, bear in mind that it is the fine grooves created by honing that hold oil
to lubricate the pistons and their rings. A groove angle of 120 degrees
is optimum. After honing, use a plateau hone to clean off the ridges of
the crosshatch grooves and thus facilitate easier seating of the rings. Afterwards,
both the pistons and bores should be again precisely measured and the pistons
paired to their optimum bores.
If you choose to install the Original Equipment
8.8:1 compression pistons with their 6.2 mm dished crowns of the earlier 18GB
through 18GK engines with their connecting rods into the later 18V engine, then
the smaller 39cc combustion chamber volume of the 18V heads will boost the compression
ratio to about 9.4:1, presuming, of course, that the machinist hasn't removed
too much material from the block or the head, in which case it will be higher.
On the other hand, if the later low compression ratio pistons of the 18V
engine (8:1) with their 16.2mm dishes are installed into an engine equipped
with the head from an 18G through 18GK Series engine with their 43cc combustion
chambers, then the compression ratio will be a very low 7.7:1. Fortunately,
the UK/European market pistons for the 18V engines were available in a 9:1 compression
ratio. Don't go over 9:1 on the compression ratio with unmodified combustion
chambers or you'll most likely regret it when it preignites on America's newest
federally mandated development: Oxygenated Gasoline. Without professionally
modified combustion chambers, any increase in compression beyond 9:1 will give
only a moderate increase in power at the expense of streetability.
Replacement of your ancient-and-probably-stretched-by-now
head studs with new stock ones from Brit Tek (Brit Tek Part # HSK001) or stronger
ones made of 8740 steel from ARP (Brit Tek Part # HSK002) is also recommended.
Stretched head studs will not hold their torque settings and will lead
to a leaking or blown head gasket and possibly a warped and/or cracked head.
Repeated retorquing with stretched head studs will likely result in a
cracked head. Retap the threads in the block prior to installing them
with antisieze compound on their threads and do not attempt to torque the studs
down as this may lead to cracking of the block. Torquing of the head compression
nuts will accomplish this task just fine. Don’t make the all-too-common
mistake of running steel head studs all the way down into the block until they
bottom out. Steel studs have a different coefficient of expansion than
that of a cast iron block and preloading them will aggravate this factor. If
they’re bottomed out in the block they can cause the deck to distort as they
expand more than the block, and that could lead to a blown gasket, or even a
cracked deck of the block. When the block cools, being a casting it will
tend to return to its original flat shape if it hasn't cracked. Never
use a thread locking compound as it will result in damage to the threads whenever
the studs are removed, rendering them useless. Should the stud spin in
its threads when torquing, check to be sure that the studs aren't undersize.
Use either the original hardened thick
head stud washers or replacement items of the best quality (thick and with machined
faces) on the head, never thin mild steel ones. Make sure that the washer
seating surfaces are machined flat with an end mill after the head has been
skimmed so that they will be a parallel plane to the mating surface so that
torque readings will be accurate. Put an anti-seize compound on the threads
prior to installing the head compression nuts and torquing them to the head.
While oiling of the threads is commonly done to protect from rust, but
the antisieze compound will do an adequate job of protecting the threads from
corrosion. If you're really paranoid about the threads corroding, then
use acorn nuts!
A word about valve materials: For
many years the standard exhaust valve steel was EN52. This steel was first
introduced over 70 to 75 years ago and has a hardness of 25 to 31 HRc. Improved
engine design has lead to increased compression ratios and higher operating
temperatures, and improved fuels with an increased octane rating and the addition
of tetra-ethyl-lead have lead to an increasing tendency to prematurely burn
out the valve. This steel is classed as "semi" corrosion resistant
as they are attacked by Chlorine and Sulfur compounds. As a result, this
material is no longer considered suitable for exhaust valves, although it is
still perfectly satisfactory for inlet valves when used with unleaded gasoline.
About 1960 a new steel, Austenitic
214N (Stainless), was developed. This steel has a hardness of 30 HRc and
retains its hardness even up to temperatures of 800 Degrees C and possesses
excellent rupture strength under high temperature conditions combined with good
creep and impact values. Its high Chromium content gives good scaling
resistance, and has greater corrosion resistance against Chlorine although is
still not immune to sulfurous attack. This is the preferred material for
use with the higher combustion temperatures attendant with unleaded gasoline.
A more recently developed material,
Nemonic 80A, has a hardness of 32 HRc and has an increased operating temperature
over Austenitic 214N as well as higher corrosion resistance. Due to its
high cost, it is commonly seen only in very high compression ratio engines built
expressly for racing.
Tufftriding (AB1 or TF1, the process used depends
upon the specification of the valve) gives a hard layer of between 72 to 74
Rockwell ‘C’ over the complete valve of approximately 10 to 20 microns in depth,
and gives excellent wear properties in a cast iron or bronze guide with the
added benefit of stress relieving the valve. This type of treatment produces
a black mottled finish all over the valve. Hard Chrome Plating gives the
stem added durability by depositing chrome on the stem to guide area of the
valve of approx. 32 to 72 microns in thickness. This gives good compatibility
if the valve is made in Austenitic 214N (Stainless) and is used in a cast iron
guide. This type of treatment is only applied to the valve stem. A
Stellite 6 deposit can be applied to the exhaust valve seat face which will
enhance the seat hardness (Rockwell ’C’ of 38 to 42 HRc) which will enable it
to be used with unleaded fuel or in highly stressed engines. A Stellite
12 deposit can be applied to the tip of the valve stem which will further enhance
the tip hardness (Rockwell ’C’ of 48 to 52 HRc).
When installed, all valves and valve
guides should be of equal respective heights. Because valve guides will frequently
distort when being pressed into their bores in the head, they should always
be reamed to their manufacturer's recommended clearances after installation
to assure a consistent internal diameter. Do not waste money on exotic
tuliped valves. Due to the side draught configuration of the B Series
Engine's ports, they will actually flow less than an Original Equipment flat-topped
valve and will increase reciprocating mass in the valvetrain unnecessarily.
Like a waisted throttle shaft, waisted valves are nice, but they really
won't have much effect in a street engine. They're primarily for very-high-rpm
racing use with a camshaft like a Piper 300 and full race heads. The risk
with waisted valve stems is that they can vibrate like a tuning fork at maximum
lift during high engine speeds. The vibration can cause metal fatigue
to set in prematurely and then the valve stem will fracture, the valve head
being sucked into the combustion chamber, there to do all sorts of evil things.
That's why they're never reground and reinstalled by racers. Short
Fatigue Life. Don't ever try to recycle them. Once the seating faces
are worn, toss them in the trash. I would make one suggestion that Mr.
Burgess does not mention in his book: for use in a street engine, once you've
had the three-angle face made on the valve, it should be either stellite-plated
or (preferably) tuftrided after lapping it in. Neither of these improvements
is overly expensive and will help to ensure a long, long service life in street
use.
Don't be tempted into trying to repair a
cracked head by taking it to a welder. Welding cast iron is a very tricky
thing, requiring the right tools. Contrary to what some welders might
tell you, as a former Tool & Diemaker I can explain why it can't be done
on a bench in the garage. The problem lies in the fact that a casting
is essentially just a bunch of bubbles held together by metal. There is
always the risk, even though the alloy of the block and the alloy of the welding
rod may be the same, that the density of the weld will be different from that
of the density of the casting. This results in different rates of expansion
and contraction when the casting heats and cools. If the density of the
weld is not the same as that of the head, the casting will crack where it adjoins
the weld and you'll find yourself back where you started.
However, because creating a weld is nothing
more than a matter of heating the metal alloy of the rod to the point that it
flows into and heats the metal of the casting to the point that it liquefies
and blends with the molten alloy of the welding rod, it is possible to achieve
the same density if certain conditions are met. First, the temperature
of the molten metal of the welding rod should be no higher than that necessary
to attain a molten state. Second, the casting should be heated in a heat
treating furnace until it almost melts. The white-hot casting then is
removed and the weld applied, then the casting is quickly placed back in the
furnace and very slowly brought down to room temperature in controlled stages.
Although this controlled cooling process will help to allow stresses to
even themselves out, the casting may be warped and require machining.
Why is it so necessary to heat the casting
in a furnace instead of just heating it with a torch on a welding bench? So
that the temperature of the weld will be as close as possible as that of the
casting. Why is that so important? First, because of the density
issue already described above. That requires a degree of precision control
that a welder can't attain with a blowtorch, even though he may sincerely believe
that he can. Face it, the man is a welder, not a trained Tool &Diemaker
or a trained Mechanical Engineer. He simply does not know any better.
Secondly, because the thermal stresses created by the extreme heat of
welding will be minimized and not be isolated to the area immediately around
the weld due to the fact that the heat differences are not as localized. Cast
iron conducts heat very slowly, so the closer the temperature of the iron of
the casting to that of the weld when the welding process begins, the less thermal
stress is generated in the areas adjacent to the weld. This elaborate
procedure is necessary to eliminate the possibility of cracking due to induced
thermal stress, which is a separate issue from that of weld density. The
whole idea behind the process is often called "stress relieving,"
a process that I'm sure that you've heard of. Now you understand just
what it is.
Needless to say, this process is expensive.
If the problem is with a crack in the head, I would just scrap it. There
are many used heads available in good condition for far less than what the above-described
process costs. You'd have to pay for the machining costs on the head either
way that you choose to go, so why bother?
The better shops will do most or all
of the aforementioned machining and engineering procedures as a matter of course.
If the shop you're considering can't provide these services, they are
merely tradesmen rather than professionals: go elsewhere.
I would also suggest that you use
the later type of crankshaft oil thrower that is common to all five-main-bearing
engines and its matching timing cover which uses a neoprene seal rather than
the leak-prone felt seal of the earlier timing chain cover. A duplex-type
camshaft drive chain tensioner, the 3/8” pitch duplex camshaft drive chain and
sprockets of the 18G through 18-V-584-Z-L and 18-V-585-Z-L Series engines, plus
a nitrided rocker shaft (Advanced Performance Technologies Part # RSB-T) will
aid in achieving long-term durability. In addition, an adjustable sprocket
(Brit Tek Part # PGS001), although expensive, will enable you to easily keep
the camshaft operating in phase with the crankshaft as all camshaft drive chains
wear and thus "stretch." However, the same objective can be
attained in a less expensive manner by using offset keys to adjust the timing
of the standard camshaft sprocket, although adjustments made in this manner
are far more troublesome and tedious. The reuse of old camshaft drive
sprockets is false economy. A set of worn sprockets will result in uneven
and accelerated wear of a new camshaft drive chain, thus causing its length
to oscillate. This will accelerate wear of the camshaft drive chain tensioner.
The oscillation of the chain will cause both the valve and ignition timing
to "wobble" inconsistently, playing havoc with performance. Install
a new slipper pad on the camshaft drive chain tensioner and check that the mechanism
is functioning properly. Be sure to inspect the bore of its adjuster body
for ovality (+. 003" max.). Should it prove to be worn out, a new
one can be obtained from Advanced Performance Technologies (APT Part # BCT-1).
Replacement or refurbishment of your
tired old harmonic balancer is highly advisable as it reduces torsional stress
on both the crankshaft and the camshaft, as well as reducing wear of the camshaft
drive chain, coolant pump, and alternator due to reduced oscillating stress
loadings. Advanced Performance Technologies' stainless steel version (APT
Part # 18CSP-2) has provision for easy removal. However, your Original
Equipment harmonic balancer can be rebuilt by a specialist (Damper Dudes, 6180
Parallel Drive, Anderson, CA 96007 (800) 413-2673).
Although the 18V-672-Z-L and later
versions of the 18V engine sacrificed dual valve springs for single valve springs
in an effort to reduce production costs, it should be remembered that these
later engines reached their maximum power output at the notably lower engine
speed of 4,800 RPM than the earlier engine's 5,400 RPM and thus spring surge
was not a problem. However, at the higher peak operating speeds and greater
valve lifts that a power-enhanced engine attains, a single valve spring is inadequate
to avoid valve bounce and spring surge. Spring surge can result in a valve
failing to close rapidly enough to avoid clashing with the piston on the upstroke,
while valve bounce can lead to a broken valve. Dual valve springs are
thus a necessity for an enhanced-performance engine in order to control spring
surge at the high engine speeds which can be achieved, especially if a hotter
camshaft that relocates the power output peak to a higher RPM is utilized.
Be aware that the early type spring
caps with square groove cotters used on the 18G through 18GF/2159 non-overdrive
and 18GF/530 overdrive engines will not work with the later type round groove
valve spring stem cups. Larger valve sizes with the square groove machined
for the earlier size keepers are not available. This is just as well, as the
round groove type is better. You will therefore need to use the later
type dual spring caps used on the 18GF/2160 non-overdrive and 18GF/531overdrive
through 18V-585-Z-L engines to go with the round groove keepers. You will
also need the valve spring collars of the 18G through 18GK Series engines to
go under the inner valve spring in order to locate it properly.
Old pushrods can be trouble. Because
of the fact that the central axis of each of the tappets is offset from that
of the camshaft and the the tappets have a .002” dome on their faces which bear
against lobes’ surfaces which are obliquely slanted away from the
rotational axis of the camshaft, the tappets spin in their bores when being
lifted by the lobe of the camshaft, thus reducing both friction at the tappet/lobe
interface and consequent wear. Should a pushrod become bent, it will prevent
the tappet from rotating in its bore, ruining the tappet/camshaft interface
and rapidly wearing out the lobe. (You weren't really going to reinstall
those ancient pushrods in a blueprinted engine, were you? Know what metal
fatigue is?) If you should choose to reuse your old Original Equipment
pushrods, they should be inspected for signs of bending and excessive end wear.
Remember that the ball ends of the pushrods have mated to their individual
tappets and rocker arm ball adjusters (11/32") have mated to the cup ends
of the pushrods over the years, so when you take them out, keep them in ordered
sets and make sure that they are oriented as they came out of the engine (cup
end up). Because the rotating faces of the rocker arms have also mated
to their adjacent rocker stands over the years, even if you intend to replace
the old pushrods with new ones, be sure to keep them in the same order as that
in which they were previously installed or you may have problems aligning the
center of the thrust faces of the rocker arms over the valve stems.
Clean the pushrods thoroughly, then
put a very thin coat of machinist's bluing or petroleum jelly on their shafts.
Roll each pushrod on a clean piece of plate glass and then examine the
stain on the glass for gaps. That'll tell you if the pushrod is bent.
Be aware that a bent pushrod can cause its tappet to stop rotating, resulting
in uneven wear of the tappet, which in turn will make accurate setting of the
valve clearances impossible and eventual ruination of the lobe of the camshaft.
When reinstalling them, make sure that you put some fresh motor oil onto
the upper end of the tappet and also down the pushrod passages to lubricate
the cups on the pushrods and the tappets.
Unlike Original Equipment pushrods,
tubular chrome-moly pushrods do not deflect at the higher engine speeds that
an enhanced-performance street engine can produce, plus they have less reciprocating
mass and thus will give more accurate valve timing at high engine speeds. This
is a problem for both the early short pushrods (72 grams) used in the 18G through
18GK Series engines and the later long pushrods (88 grams) used in the 18V Series
engines as they tend to deflect as much as 5/64" at high engine speeds.
Crane makes an excellent set of 5/16" diameter 18V pushrods (64 grams)
for this purpose (Crane Part # 905-0004) and can supply them in custom lengths
if necessary. They have a website at http://www.cranecams.com/ . Due
to their larger diameter (.3125" Vs .280"), it will be necessary to
relieve the passages in the head for the pushrods in order to eliminate interference.
Be aware that simply boring these passageways to .660” to accomplish this
may leave insufficient material to permit portwork to be done.
The shorter (1 1/2" length),
lighter bucket tappets (45 grams) introduced on the 18V-584-Z-L engines will
also assist in the goal of reducing reciprocating mass. Due to their having
identical diameters of 13/16” (.8125”), the early long barrel tappets (81 grams)
and the later short bucket tappets are interchangeable when paired with their
length-appropriate pushrods. The later OE tappet/pushrod assembly is 13%
lighter than the earlier OE long barrel tappet (2.298")/short pushrod (8
3/4") combination used in the earlier 18G through 18GK Series engines.
The reduced deflection angle of the longer pushrods (10 1/2") decreases
side thrust loads on the tappets and thus enhances their lifespan. Crane's
lighter chrome-moly pushrods will also reduce inertia in the reciprocating mass
of the valve train by about 20% when compared to that of the later Original
Equipment 18V short bucket tappet/long push rod combination and by 30% when
compared with the earlier Original Equipment 18G through 18GK Series long tappet/short
pushrod combination.
Be aware that the heads used on the
18G through 18GK Series engines and those used on the 18V Series engines are
of different thicknesses due to the different depths of their combustion chambers
and redesigned coolant passages of the 18V Series engines. As a result,
the heads used on the 18G through 18GK Series engines are taller (3.172")
than those of the 18V Series engines. As a consequence of this, their
pushrod/tappet combinations have different included lengths (277mm 18G through
18GK, 274mm 18V). As a result, if you should choose to install the
later 18V bucket tappets and longer pushrods into an engine equipped with one
of these earlier heads, it will be necessary to screw their rocker arm ball
adjusters 3mm further towards the bottom of their travel. This will result
in an increase in the effective length of the fulcrum arm of the rocker, with
a consequential slight decrease of valve lift.
If coupled with new Original Equipment-specification
dual valve springs and their valve spring cups as used in the pre-18V engines,
this reduction in reciprocating mass should be sufficient to easily protect
the engine from valvetrain float and valve/piston clash up to at least 6,700
RPM when used in concert with camshafts and rocker arms that have the standard
amount of lift, plus reduce both camshaft and tappet wear as a result of their
lower inertia loads. These valve springs should have a free length of
1 31/32” (inner spring) and 2 9/64” (outer spring), and for proper preload they
should have an installed length of 1 7/16” (inner spring) and 1 9/16” (outer
spring). Taken collectively, all this should ensure more accurate valve
timing resulting in a smoother, more powerful output at high engine speeds.
Although simply fitting a stiffer
set of valve springs as a less expensive alternative to reducing reciprocating
mass in the valvetrain is possible, in reality it's a poor practice. The
additional pressure on the cam lobe/tappet interface and the increased stress
on the camshaft drive chain and sprockets will result in accelerated wear of
these components. In extreme cases the increased torsional stress can
also cause the camshaft to distort along its axis at high rpm, playing havoc
with valve timing and risking the breakage of the camshaft itself. Should
you elect to use a camshaft with an amount of lift greater than .450" you
should consider further reduction of the reciprocating mass further by substituting
a set of lightweight alloy spring caps for the heavier steel Original Equipment
items. Should you choose to employ them, light alloy spring caps should
be checked for deformation at the time of every valve adjustment in order to
prevent the valve from pulling through the cap, resulting in a dropped valve.
Always use valve springs with rates and lengths that are recommended by
the manufacturer of the camshaft. If the installed lengths of the new
springs are to be greater than that of the Original Equipment items (Inner:
1 7/16", Outer: 1 9/16"), it will be necessary to counterbore the
spring seat surfaces in the head to the proper depth to attain the manufacturer's
recommended preload setting length for the springs. Many amateur engine
builders will attempt to prevent the springs from binding by being sure that
when they are installed they have a certain minimum of .XXX" clearance
between the coils. Unfortunately, there is no such "magic clearance
figure" that will universally insure against this. Always follow the spring
manufacturer's recommendation on this issue, just as you would on the issue
of installed height. Peter Burgess recommends a .050" difference
between the compressed height when the valve is at full lift and the fully compressed
height to avoid valvetrain compression damage.
Just as gasoline is the food of an
engine and its cylinders are its lungs, so oil is the life blood of an engine
and the oil pump is its heart. I cannot overemphasize the importance of
this fact. If your engine is to live a healthy life, its oil pump must
be immaculately rebuilt. Unless you're building a highly stressed high
output engine, your Original Equipment-specification oil pump will be adequate
to the task. This is due to the fact that its design is of the eccentric
rotor type. Its rate of flow increases in direct proportion to the engine
speed. Any increase in pressure beyond that of the oil release valve spring
rating results in the opening of the oil pressure regulating valve and the excess
oil falling into the oil sump. Properly rebuilt, it should deliver 60
to 70 PSI at idle when oil temperature is 200 degrees Fahrenheit. The
early version of this pump used on the three-main-bearing version of the engine
had a problem of having its pressure fall off above 5,500 RPM, an issue which
was addressed on the five-main-bearing engines by machining the pump cover and
providing a second inlet port to the sump.
A high-volume/high-pressure oil pump
will only require more power to function as well as increase stress and consequent
wear on both its spindle gear and its drive gear on the camshaft as well as
increasing torsional stress on the oil pump drive shaft. Because such
an oil pump is of additional benefit only at low engine speeds on an Original
Equipment-specification block, it will do little for any engine other than one
whose oiling system has been comprehensively modified to suit a high performance
specification. Should you choose to pursue this objective, it would be
prudent to install a bronze spindle gear to preclude the rapid wear that attends
such applications and to preclude breakage at high engine speeds. This
can be obtained from Cambridge Motorsports.
Remove any and all burrs that you
can find in the pump body and make sure that the pressure regulating valve operates
freely. It should have a satin finish chrome plating on it to prevent
galling. Be sure to lap it into its seat to ensure idle pressure and to
flush out the lapping compound completely before reassembly. The relief
valve spring should have a free length of 3 inches. Using your factory
service manual, check the clearance tolerances on the rotor and make sure that
the passageways in the body and delivery arm have no sudden steps or angles
to inhibit oil flow. These can often be removed with a Dremel tool and
a polishing bit. Doing so should eliminate the risk of a loss of oil pressure
resulting from cavitation at operating speeds up to 6,800 RPM.
The Special Tuning Manual mentions, amongst
other modifications, machining an extra feed port into the bottom end cover
of the oil pump to improve flow. Today's replacement pumps already incorporate
some of these modifications, but do not include the extra feed port. Some
specialist suppliers offer pumps fully modified with the extra feed port according
to the Special Tuning Manual specifications for use in engines that attain very
high engine speeds. The disadvantage of this modification is that when
the engine is shut off the extra feed port then becomes a drainage passage.
Oil that is inside the pump body flows back into the sump. At each
cold startup, it will require an extra second or two for oil pressure to build
up. In addition, after every oil change it will take longer to build up
oil pressure (about 20-30 seconds or more) because draining the oil sump exposes
the oil pickup, and this helps drain the oil out of the pump through the extra
port. While this is not a problem on a racing engine that will be disassembled
and inspected several times during a season, on a street driven car it can contribute
to severely shortening the life of the journals of the crankshaft as well as
that of the engine bearings. Unlike racers at a track, few owners of street-driven
cars will be willing to go through the procedure of repriming the oil pump every
time that they want to start their engines.
Be aware
that two different diameter oil strainers (105mm and 135mm) were used to protect
the oil pump, the larger of the two being the more desirable due to its larger
strainer area. When mounting it to the oil pickup extension of the oil
pump, take care to ensure that its top surface is flat against its gasket and
is well sealed so that no air leak can occur. Under normal operating conditions
this area is below the level of the oil, but under hard cornering it can become
exposed to the air, resulting in air bubbles being pumped into the bearings
and in consequent hammering of the bearing surfaces. If you have a tendency
to push the car very hard through curves and turns, this later oil strainer
was introduced on and is common to all five-main-bearing versions of the engine.
If you have a tendency to push the car hard through curves, have a baffle
plate welded into the sump pan to prevent oil surge and thus ensure a ready
supply of oil for the pump. A blueprint for a sump baffle plate can be
found on page 457 of the Bentley manual. If you do not have access to
the means to create your own baffle plate, one may be purchased from Cambridge
Motorsports. They have two versions available, one compatible with the 105mm
oil strainer of the 18G and 18GA Series engines and the other with the 135mm
oil strainer of the 18GB through all 18V Series engines.
It is possible to install the larger capacity
12H3541 oil sump of the 18GA through 18GK engines onto a 18V engine to take
advantage of its 50% larger oil capacity (9 pints Vs 6 pints). Although
the earlier oil sump has a bulge at its rear to allow for drainage from a slot
in the earlier rear main bearing cap, its lip will match the flange of the later
engine. Both oil sumps have the same bolt hole pattern and use the same
gasket. However, the later 18V sump is not usable with the earlier 18GA
through 18GK engines due to its lack of the bulge at the rear.
While the oil supply created by an Original-Equipment
oil pump and oiling passages in the block is adequate for use within the normal
operating speeds of a stock-output engine, if an increased-output engine is
called upon to operate at higher than normal engine speeds or under heavier
loadings, such as when a Piper BP285 camshaft is installed or the engine is
modified to Big Bore specifications, it becomes prudent to modify the oiling
system. This is due to the fact that the oil flow from the front main
bearing supplies the number one cylinder's connecting rod big end bearing, oil
flow from the rear main bearing supplies the number four cylinder's connecting
rod big end bearing, and the flow from the center main bearing supplies both
of the connecting rod big end bearings for cylinders number two and three. The
oil passages from the main oil gallery to the main bearings are all the same
diameter, thus for the same oil pressure they all have the same flow capacity.
However, the center main bearing has almost twice the flow requirement
because it is oiling three bearings (the center main bearing and two connecting
rod big end bearings) as opposed to only two bearings for each of the front
and rear cylinders (one main bearing and one connecting rod big end bearing).
To compensate for this, open up the
oil passage from the pump to the oil outlet at the rear of the block to 1/2"
(.500"), the same size as the outlet on the oil pump. A special 1/2"
Internal Diameter oil feed line using -10 Aeroquip adapter fittings will need
to be custom-fabricated to enable the increased oil supply to flow efficiently
to the oilfilter stand. The oil passage to the center main bearing will
then need to be enlarged from its original 5/16" (.3125”) to 11/32"
(.34375”) diameter and the main crankshaft journals #2 and #4 cross drilled
and center grooved. This grooving should be accomplished by grinding rather
that by turning on a lathe to prevent the creation of stress risers that could
result in breakage of the journal. The journals for the connecting rods
cross should then be drilled 110 degrees back from Top Dead Center with the
drilled passage intersecting the original oil passage to prevent lubrication
failure resulting from centrifugal forces at high engine speeds. Remember
that whenever any journal is drilled it will need to be chamfered and reground
afterwards. The crankshaft should then be hardened. With these modifications,
a high volume oil pump becomes useful as the extra flow through the bearings
provides additional cooling under conditions of high load and sustained high
engine speeds and you should be able to reliably run the engine to 7,000 RPM.
However, if you desire higher operating speeds than 6,500 RPM, you will
have to fit rocker arms which run on needle bearings as the standard bushings
will fail. Cambridge Motorsport offers these items as roller rocker arms in
either the Original Equipment 1.426:1 or 1.625:1 high lift ratios with the option
of either central or offset oil feed. Both types are located by tubular
steel spacers to prevent the rocker arms from "walking" at high engine
speeds.
Be aware that there are essentially three
types of bearings available to support the crankshaft. The first and best
of the two is a trimetal type with an Indium overlay while the second type is
Lead/Bronze or Lead/Copper, and third the A or SA material normally used in
OEM engines, primarily due to their lower cost and the fact that they withstand
with dirty oil better. The first two types are acceptable for long term
use in a high performance engine.
The 18V models of the B Series engine progressively
underwent several changes in order to reduce production cost. Amongst
these was the deletion of the oiling passages in both the rocker arm and in
the tappet adjusting screw which provided ample lubrication to the cupped upper
end of the pushrods. These engines had camshafts that were made with the
same lobe profile as before, but its timing was advanced by four degrees. In
its initial versions with a head that had a larger intake valve to compensate
for the retiming of the camshaft, the 18V-584-Z-L, 18V-585-Z-L, 18V-672-Z-L,
and 18V-673-Z-L versions made slightly more power at the same engine speed as
the previous 18G through 18GK series engines. However, the subsequent
versions reverted to the original smaller intake valve which relocated the power
peak lower downward and thus the additional lubrication provided by the passages
in the rocker arms and ball end adjusters were deemed unnecessary. However,
on an enhanced performance engine the retrofitting of these earlier-specification
items can in some cases be a wise move for prolonging the lifespan of these
components.
While the radiator performs the function
of cooling the head and cylinders, it is the oil that cools the internal parts
of the engine. To assist in this function, as well as to help protect
the lubricating qualities of the oil from breakdown, an oil cooler was fitted
to all MGBs except during the 1975 through 1980 production years when power
output was chopped in an effort to meet emissions regulations. US market
cars had a 13 row cooler, and this should be considered to be the minimum for
an enhanced performance engine. If your car has one, be sure that it is
hot tanked along with the other components and thoroughly cleaned out before
reinstalling it. If you are replacing it or installing one for the first
time, use one that has at least 16 rows and install a 200 degree Fahrenheit
thermostatic bypass valve as overcooled oil can rob power and lead to accelerated
wear. An excellent thermostatic bypass valve with 1/2" NPT threads
is available from Perma-Cool (Perma-Cool Part# 1070). Perma-Cool has a
website at http://www.perma-cool.com/ .
Another item that is used to help reduce
oil temperature is a larger capacity finned die cast aluminum oil sump. These
have integral vertical internal baffle plates to preclude oil surge. The optional
removable aluminum alloy baffle plate covers are available for both 105mm and
135mm strainer sizes. Primarily intended for racing use, these are rarely seen
on street engines as they are expensive and, being an aluminum casting, vulnerable
to damage by debris thrown from the front tires. However, they have an
additional advantage of adding greater rigidity to the block. They are
available in both aluminum and magnesium in both baffled and unbaffled form
from Cambridge Motorsport. Should you decide to use one, be mindful of
the fact that they use a large rubber O-ring for sealing instead of a gasket
and as such will require that you have the mounting flange on your engine skimmed
flat and the mounting holes chamfered and retapped with a 1/4"-20 tap or
it will certainly leak and crack. These are also available with a compatible
sump baffle plate from Cambridge Motorsport.
Of course, when it comes to protecting your
engine, there is no substitute for an effective oil filtration system. The
felt element used in the early oil filters is technically obsolete. It
simply can't filter as effectively as the filtering mediums used in modern spin-on
cartridge-type oil filters can. Fortunately, the oil filter head introduced
on the late 18GH engine that uses a cartridge-type oil filter can be fitted
to the older engines. If you have an earlier engine, obtain the filter
head and its rubber O-ring that fits to the block, the bolt and copper seal
that attaches the adapter to the block, and the copper washer and adapter for
the oil hose that goes in front. This last item may not be needed as there
are two types of oil hose fittings: one that uses a large banjo bolt and one
that uses a screw on fitting off the line. You will need the oil hose
adapter only if yours doesn't use the banjo fitting. Make sure that the
filter head still has the anti drain tube fitted. Avoid using filters
that are taller than necessary, otherwise when the engine is shut off any oil
above the stand tube will drain out of the filter, leaving an air pocket that
must be filled before oil pressure can be achieved. The choices of filters
available are almost endless, the best of these including those from Mann (Part#
W917) , Purolator Pure One (Part# PL20081), AC Delco (Part# PF13C), and Motorcraft
(Part# FL300), but the most effective is also the easiest to install: the K&N
Performance Gold Oil Filter (K&N Part# HP2004). If your is a pre-1968
generator-equipped engine, you might prefer to convert to the spin-on oil filter
adapter offered by Moss Motors (Moss Motors Part# 235-940) as it mounts the
filter cartridge in a downward position and can accept long filters with a substantially
greater filtration media surface area. This adapter will accept filters
made by AC Delco (Part# PF60), Purolator (Part# L20064 &Part# L24457), and
K&N (Part# HP 2009).
An Old-Timey-Mechanic’s trick is to use
a large rubber band to secure a powerful magnet to the oil filter to capture
metal particles caught in the oiling system, thus protecting the finely-machined
surfaces of the engine. This is particularly beneficial during the break in
period. Although the block is invariably cleaned out after all of the
machining operations are done, sometimes this is not done as diligently as one
would hope. In any case, there's always a little bit left lurking in the
recesses that are the most difficult to clean, just waiting to do harm at some
future date. I've seen these flakes appear in the oil of engines that
had over 50,000 miles on them. A fine-straining filter may stop them,
but such a filter gets clogged up earlier and then then its bypass valve opens,
allowing everything to circulate with the oil, be it dirt, grit, metal particles,
bits of old dinosaur bones, you name it. If it doesn’t have a bypass filter,
then the pressure crushes the filtration element, pulling its ends away from
their sealing seats, and the oil simply flows around it into the engine.
Another good precaution is to install a magnetic oil sump plug (Moss Motors
Part # 328-282). I've been using both methods for over thirty years and
am always surprised at what gets caught by the magnets. Of couse, the
magnets are no substitute for a good, fine-straining filter!
Simply put, an engine creates power by inhaling
a fuel-air mixture, combusting it, and then exhaling it. There is no point
in trying to get more fuel-air mixture into an engine if the hot combustion
gases can't get out efficiently, so let's tackle the subject of exhaust systems
first.
The standard pre-1975 factory exhaust manifolds,
of which there were two models, are surprisingly good performers. The
exhaust manifold used with the SU HS4 carburetors’ intake manifold have a mounting
flange thickness of 9/16" and can be readily identified by an external
casting number of 12H709, while the exhaust manifold used with the SU HIF4 carburetors’
intake manifold has a mounting flange thickness of 7/16" and can be readily
identified by an external casting number of 12H3911. I highly recommend
electropolishing to improve the flow capacity of a cast iron exhaust manifold.
Electropolishing is an electrochemical process used to smooth metal, usually
prior to plating. It is commonly performed on a precision casting (such
as a window winder handle) or on prepolished sheet metal after it has been formed
to shape (such as a bumper) prior to plating it. The item to be electropolished
is thoroughly cleaned, then emersed in a chemical bath. A current is then
run through and the highest points on the surface of the metal are removed.
In a sense, it's the reverse of plating in that metal is removed instead
of deposited. The advantage of electropolishing a cast iron exhaust manifold
is that because the item is completely emersed, the process can get inside the
manifold, reaching into every crevice so that it will polish the interior of
an exhaust manifold quite nicely where human hands and mechanical tools can't
reach, the smoother surface making for reduced turbulence in the exhaust gas
flow just like the smooth walls of an exhaust manifold constructed of tubular
steel. Be sure to instruct the firm doing the electropolishing to protect
the gasket surfaces with plater's tape as an overly smooth mating surface may
give sealing problems when used with some gaskets. I sincerely believe
that a 1 3/4" tubular steel exhaust manifold won't flow any better than
an electropolished OE cast iron exhaust manifold if they have the same basic
design. It can also be beneficial to electropolish combustion chambers
and exhaust ports (reduced carbon buildup, for example). Because of the
lesser heat conductivity of the cast iron and the decreased surface area, the
electropolished exhaust manifold will radiate less heat into the engine compartment.
Its greater mass will also have the side benefit of reducing noise to
a level less than that attainable with a tubular steel header.
Another technique for attaining a smooth
interior surface in the exhaust manifold is called Forced Extrusion Honing.
In this technique a dense mixture of abrasive clay is forced through the
interior of the manifold, polishing the surfaces to an even greater degree than
can be achieved on a casting through electropolishing. I've seen a head
in which both the intake and exhaust ports have been subjected to this process
and it is very impressive.
Reducing temperatures inside the engine
compartment is beneficial for power output. For every 3 degrees Centigrade
(5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) that the air injested by the engine is lowered, power
output is raised by 1%. Although wrapping the exhaust manifold in insulating
tape (sometimes called lagging) may seem to be a good idea in principle, it
is a very bad idea in practice. Why? The heat can't escape from
a wrapped cast iron exhaust manifold and both the head and the exhaust manifold
will consequently run hotter. The heat will just build up and up, far
beyond what the factory engineers designed it to handle, with the result that
the exhaust manifold will warp. In addition, the heat is also transfered
to the head, heating the walls of the intake ports and thus reducing the density
of the incoming fuel/air charge. Peter Burgess mentions this problem in
his book "How to Power Tune MGB 4-Cylinder Engines." Even worse,
the coolant passages in the head were not designed to remove so much heat, thus
preignition of the fuel/air charge can become a problem and valve seat life
can be shortened. In extereme cases, the head can actually warp beetween
#2 and #3 cylinders. In the case of tubular steel headers, the metal will
become so hot that it will spall and form flakes that will eventually disintegrate
to form a hole in the area where the heat accumulation is greatest, usually
at the junction of the pipes. The tape also becomes a moisture trap, accelerating
the rusting process that can plague exhaust manifolds.
Instead of wrapping the exhaust manifold,
get it Jet-Hot coated. Jet-Hot coating is a ceramic coating that can be
applied to coat both the interior of the exhaust manifold as well as the exterior.
The heat will have nowhere to go except out through the exhaust system,
thus it will greatly reduce underhood temperatures. The biggest advantage
of this is that the air being inhaled into the engine being denser, more fuel
can be mixed with it to result in a more powerful fuel/air charge. Another
benefit is that the setting of heat-sensitive SU HIF4 carburetors can remain
more consistent. One word of warning to those considering Jet-Hot coating
or any other type of ceramic coating: Be sure that the entire surface of the
manifold, both the interior as well as the exterior of the manifold and that
of the flanges is coated so that the heat of the exhaust gases will pass on
through the system instead of being absorbed and trapped in the metal of the
manifold, otherwise the manifold will create the same problems as in the case
of wrapping the manifold with insulating wrap. Jet-Hot has a website at
http://www.jet-hot.com/ . Should you decide to use a tubular exhaust manifold
that is not Jet-Hot coated, be sure to use a rubber gasket on the rear tappet
chest cover as cork gaskets tend to fail under prolonged exposure to the extreme
heat radiated by such headers. Use of the more warpage-resistant rear
tappet chest cover from the 18V-883-AE-L, 18V-884-AE-L, 18V-890-AE-L and 18V-891-AE-L
engines will assist in this as well.
When using a gasket with a metalized face
to install the exhaust manifold, it is wise to install the metalized side of
the exhaust manifold gasket facing toward the exhaust manifold so that the mating
surface of the exhaust manifold can expand and contract along the metalized
face of the gasket. However, it is best to use the gasket available from
Advanced Performance Technologies (APT Part# CMG-02) as it has excellent compressibility
and oversize holes for modified ports. Its graphite-impregnated material
allows for superior ease of expansion and contraction of the exhaust manifold
and also makes for very easy removal.
As good as the OE exhaust manifolds
are, the rest of the exhaust system can be improved upon, and for this the Peco
exhaust system is a high-quality choice. There are plenty of aftermarket
exhaust systems on the market, but those made by Peco seem to be the ones that
live up to its manufacturer's promises and hence has become increasingly popular.
It's the only header whose design takes into account the critical fact
that the head uses a siamesed port for the exhaust valves of the middle two
cylinders and hence has an oversize center branch pipe. Their quality
control is very tight for that of an aftermarket manufacturer, so their system
always seems to fit without a lot of bending, hammering, and cursing. It
also performs well on both modified and stock engines, which usually can't be
said for many of the others: they either work well only on stock specification
engines, or work well only on engines that have been modified according to a
specific recipe which will consist of other components made by the same company
(which, of course, the advertisers never get around to pointing out before you
spend your money on the #@!! thing!). The Peco system is street legal.
Often a performance exhaust will sound good at idle and while accelerating,
but then turns into a howling monster while cruising on the highway and literally
drives you out of the car, ears ringing. This might be acceptable in a
race car, but not in a street machine. At highway speeds the Peco system
is actually quieter than an Original Equipment system, emitting a rich baritone
sound rather than the ear-pounding basso profundo or the rasping tenor of some
other systems. The gray system will fit the Original Equipment 1 3/4"
pre-1975 exhaust manifolds without modification while the red 2" Big Bore
system will require the use of the Peco 2" Big Bore header. The Big
Bore system is actually intended for use on larger bore engines (1868cc or larger)
or smaller-bore engines fitted with flowed heads and hot camshafts such as the
Piper BP285. When fitted to smaller bore engines with Original Equipment
camshafts they will result in a bit more high-RPM power at the expense of some
low-RPM tractability. This is due to the larger bore of the exhaust system
reducing gas velocity which in turn reduces scavenging effect in the combustion
chambers. In addition, radiant heat from the tubular steel of the header
is much greater, exposing the air in the engine compartment, the intake manifold
and carburetors, and the fuel system to more heat, thus reducing fuel/air charge
density and hence reducing power output. Jet-Hot coating of the header
is therefore highly recommended. The lack of any middle resonator simplifies
the Peco system and allows you more ground clearance (something every 'B' can
use!) and allows the fitting of a slip-and-clamp American-made performance catalytic
converter where the middle resonator used to be and thus satisfying the emission
laws of many localities. However, if local regulations require it, or
if you simply choose to rebuild the engine to Original Equipment specification,
an excellent quality replacement twin muffler system is made by Falcon and can
be had from Brit Tek (Part# FES001, MGB 1962-1974; Part# FES002, MGB 1975; Part#
FES003, MGB 1976-1980). Brit Tek has a website at http://www.brittek.com/
Just as a less restrictive exhaust
system is necessary to permit a high performance engine to breathe, restrictions
in the intake tract will likewise need to be reduced. For a Chrome Bumper
car this is not a problem. A pair of 3 1/4" deep K&N airfilters
(APT Part# SD23-319) will permit increased airflow without sacrificing protection.
with proper jet adjustment, these larger aircleaners are worth about 3
HP on their own. When attempting to build a deeper-breathing engine, they
are a prerequisite. The B Series engine with its Siamesed 5 port design
causes some very powerful shockwaves within the induction system. The
volume and depth of this large filter dissipates these very effectively. Both
cone and pancake type filters reflect these shockwaves back into the induction
system, causing induction pulse problems which will increasingly disrupt airflow
above 3,500 RPM. One thing that I might suggest would be the fitting of
a pair of Advanced Performance Technologies stub stacks (APT Part# SS51) between
the carburetors and these custom aircleaners. This additional refinement
won't create a perceptible increase in power (about 2 HP increase), but they
will make both the throttle response and the engine running characteristics
slightly smoother by reducing turbulence at the mouth of the intake tract, thus
providing more efficient fuel atomization and allowing the greater flow potential
of the larger airfilters to be fully exploited. They might even eventually
pay for themselves by thus slightly improving fuel economy (maybe). The
Original Equipment aircleaner boxes incorporate stubstacks into the airfilter
housing design, so it's obvious that the engineers at the factory saw the value
in them.
When coupled with a Maniflow intake
manifold (British Automotive Part# SUB4-2) the improvements become even more
impressive. If you choose to use this intake manifold with SU HIF4 carburetors
you will need to use either the early version of the UK/European Market SU HIF4
carburetors with the vacuum takeoff fitting on the carburetor body for provision
for a ported advance mechanism, or, if you use the North American Market SU
HIF4 which lacks provision for a vacuum takeoff, you will need to use the thinner
Advanced Performance Technologies' carburetor spacers (APT Part# MFA338) which
come suitably modified to provide fittings for the vacuum lines to a manifold
advance distributor, as well as the later exhaust manifold (Casting# 3911) as
both have a mounting flange thickness of 7/16". This spacer with
the vacuum takeoff incorporated into its design is a Maniflow item intended
to be used with the Maniflow intake manifold which has no provision for vacuum
takeoff on its crossover balance tube. A companion unported spacer of
the same thickness is also available from Advanced Performance Technologies,
although a second spacer with a vacuum takeoff may be substituted to allow the
use of a vacuum-assisted servo for a power brake system. Advanced Performance
Technologies also offers the option of welding in a nipple on the crossover
tube which would allow the use of an anti-run-on valve. Because both the
angle of this intake manifold is higher (20 degrees) than that of the Original
Equipment intake manifold in order to enhance its flow characteristics, and
variances in production tolerances of the bodyshell of the car, in a few cases
larger diameter aircleaners will not allow the installation of an underhood
insulation pad, hence the thinner design of the Advanced Performance Technologies
spacers.
Why not stay with the OE intake manifold?
Due to the sudden change of cross section that occurs in the area of the
balance tube intersection, the airflow within them is markedly disrupted. The
resulting turbulence causes the fuel/air mixture to condense somewhat and also
impedes airflow. While smoothing the inside the manifold can reduce this,
it can't take the place of the better design of the Maniflow intake manifold.
The Original Equipment dual carburetor
intake manifolds are insulated from the heat of the head by a pair of thick
phenolic spacers. Unfortunately, these are only partially effective at
their task of keeping heat out of the induction system. Because the intake
manifolds are made of aluminum, the heat is rapidly transferred to the incoming
fuel/air charge, reducing its density and decreasing performance. However,
this rapid transfer of the heat does effectively prevent it from reaching the
carburetors. To eliminate this hindrance to performance, Jet-Hot coating
of the intake manifold is highly recommended.
When seeking improvements in airflow
capacity, things become considerably more complicated when trying to fit aircleaners
on a Rubber Bumper car that has been modified to use dual carburetors. Unfortunately,
the way the servo-boosted master cylinder projects from the bulkhead forces
most conventional owners into the use of conical airfilters when installing
dual carburetors. The problem with the conical airfilters is their shallowness
which creates induction pulse problems, their small internal volume which will
not allow the fitting of a set of stub stacks, and their small surface area.
The K&N airfilters all use the same filtering medium, so the smaller
the surface area of the filter, the less the airflow potential will be. Conversely,
the bigger the surface area, the greater the airflow potential. This is
why the 6" X 3 1/4" deep filters are preferred by those who go for
serious power increases with a B Series engine. Induction pulse problems
aside, the airflow capacity of the little conical or pancake filters is more
appropriate to a mildly power-enhanced A Series engine, such as is fitted to
the MG Midget or the Austin Healey Sprite. In addition to this problem,
the remote floatbowls of the SU HS4 carburetor will interfere with the master
cylinder, thus such a conversion requires the use of a set of SU HIF4 carburetors.
Retrofitting the earlier non-boosted
master cylinder is the common solution, but this is not a bolt on affair as
its mounting flange is turned 90 degrees so the mounting holes of the pedal
box won't line up, and the appropriate earlier pedal box assembly is radically
different, even having a different mounting hole pattern at its base that requires
drilling a new pattern in the body of the car. This is just one of the
reasons that it's unusual to see a Rubber Bumper model with an uprated B Series
engine: It's much more work. When somebody wants to go for really dramatic
power increases, he swiftly comes to think that he'll need to retrofit the earlier
brake master cylinder and pedal box assembly so that he can mount airfilters
that have a decent airflow capacity onto the carburetors like the Chrome Bumper
model owners do. "After all," he reasons, "it's not that
difficult, really, it just requires some persistence and time, plus another
master cylinder and the earlier pedal box assembly. If my boosting servo
and master cylinder are in good shape, then I can always sell them as a unit
to help cover the cost of the earlier master cylinder and pedal box assembly
because the servo is getting harder and harder to find." And, to
the conventional, orthodox thinker, this reasoning holds true. However,
read on-
Fabrication of
a plenum chamber to go on the carburetors and running a large diameter breather
duct hose to a remote aircleaner housing would enable the retention of the existing
boosted brake system. From the aircleaner housing the intake hose can
be run to the air passages neatly provided beneath the bumper in the vented
front valance of the 1972 through 1974 1/2 models of the chrome bumper cars.
You'll need to do some scavenging in the junkyards to find the right box
(more work) and then figure out a mounting system for it (still more work),
but the larger, more commodious engine compartment of the later Rubber Bumper
models should make it a relatively easy task. To equal the airflow capacity
of a pair of 6" diameter 3 1/4" deep round airfilters you'll need
an airfilter housing box with a filter that has an area of about 122 square
inches (11" X 11").
Now for the subject of the fuel system:
Fuel pumps and carburetors are precision instruments that do not take well to
the presence of dirt. As such they should be well protected. Install
a transparent fuel filter in the feed line just prior to the junction that feeds
both carburetors, then install a second transparent fuel filter in the feed
line that runs from the fuel tank to the fuel pump. If the transparent
filters that you elect to use should happen to have glass housing bodies, these
can be easily protected by sliding a short section of transparent thick wall
tubing over them. A petcock-type valve will simplify replacement in the
future, preventing fuel from the carburetors from draining into the boot when
the fuel line is disconnected from the filter. Whenever you see debris
in this filter simply replace it with the one that is before the carburetors
and then install the new filter in the line before the carburetors. By
using this approach you can best protect the carburetors and the fuel pump as
well. With a pumping capacity of 12 U.S. gallons per hour, the Original
Equipment SU fuel pump is adequate for feeding the requirements of any streetable
B Series Engine.
The use of the Weber DCOE 45 carburetor
on street MGBs came about as a result of their use on the factory team's racers.
This fact, of course, produced a "monkey see, monkey do" mentality
amongst those seeking more power for their street MGBs. Why did the factory
race team choose the Weber over the tried-and-true SUs? It has to do with
the design differences between the two. The SU is a Variable Venturi type,
which makes for smooth although slightly slow throttle response and excellent
fuel economy. The Weber DCOE 45, on the other hand, is a Fixed Venturi
type. It has the advantage of having an injector pump to shoot raw gasoline
into the venturi when the throttle opens rapidly and thus makes for very fast
throttle response. This was a definite advantage on the race track, so
that's part of the reason why the factory race team chose it over the SU. Remember
that on a race track, smoothness and economy must be subordinate to responsiveness,
as its responsiveness that makes aggressive driving possible. Victory
is what counts on the track, and nothing else will substitute.
This fast throttle response produces the
illusion of more power and so purchasers of this unit tend to experience what
Psychologists call the "Halo Effect": they've paid out the big money,
sweated the installation, spent more money to convert their ignition system
to a centrifugal advance distributor (Weber carburetors don't have provision
for a vacuum takeoff for working with vacuum advance ignition systems: read
the fine print!) and so they're already predisposed to feel the power increase
even before they drive. When the quick throttle response creates the illusion
of more power, they're like religious converts! In reality, all other
factors being equal, there is no worthwhile difference between them in terms
of power output on the dynamometer readouts unless a radical camshaft is being
used. Should you decide to use this carburetor, you would be well advised
to use a Soft Mount kit to protect it from the effects of vibration (APT Part
# SMW-45).
Unfortunately, the Weber's intake manifold
imposes a major drawback: In order to facilitate the mounting of an aircleaner
with adequate flow capabilities, its 9.5 cm length is short. This shortness
forces the use of a very curvaceous path between the carburetor and the intake
ports, which in turn causes the fuel charge to be biased towards the ports for
the outer cylinders (#1 & #4). The result is that the outer cylinders
(#1 ) tend to run richer while the inner cylinders (#2 & #3) tend
to run leaner, the differential between the two increasing with engine speed
due to the increasingly greater inertia of the fuel. The Weber 13 cm swan-necked
intake manifold, or the similar one offered by Oselli, will reduce this tendency
while being more appropriate to camshafts whose designs are oriented toward
producing more low rpm and midrange power at the expense of high rpm power,
but to fit an efficient aircleaner you will need to rework the inner body panel
with a soft mallet. This was never a problem for the factory race team,
but many private owners will take exception to the idea of hammering away at
their engine compartments. Consequently, the combined inlet manifold,
carburetor, and air cleaner assembly should not exceed 13 3/4" in depth
as this is the maximum allowable for inner fender clearance.
It should be understood that torque characteristics
are not determined by the length of the intake manifold or of ram pipes. Instead,
they are determined by the camshaft. The main function of ram pipes is
merely to reduce turbulence in the incoming fuel/air charge. If you look
into the mouth of your Original Equipment aircleaner boxes you will see what
is called a "stub stack." They are there specifically to reduce
turbulence. A Weber DCOE carburetor has a fair amount of turbulence at
its mouth, so a ram pipe is used to reduce it. It is of significant importance
to have the appropriate length of the intake tract for the characteristics of
the camshaft. A camshaft that produces a powerful low end torque output
functions best with a long intake tract, while a camshaft that produces a powerful
horsepower output at high engine speeds functions best with a short intake tract.
A Weber DCOE 45 can use different length ram pipes to achieve this rather
than forcing the owner to spend more money for different length intake manifolds.
If the racer is going to drive on a slow, twisting track where low and
midrange power output is critical to victory, he can change his camshaft and
tappets, change the metering in the Weber DCOE, and change to a longer ram pipe.
If he is going to race on a faster track, he can change his camshaft and
tappets, change the metering in the Weber DCOE, and change to a shorter ram
pipe to obtain higher output at high engine speeds. There is, however,
a major drawback to the use of ram pipes: the carburetion can be very sensitive
to small errors in metering, running rich or lean if the adjustment is off by
only a small amount. As such, it is not quite as good as using a longer
or shorter intake manifold, but for an amateur racer, it is much more affordable.
For professional racers who do have the optimum length intake manifold
for the track that they are racing on, they can fine tune the intake tract by
experimenting with different length short ram pipes during practice laps. The
availability of different length ram pipes is one of the reasons that the Weber
DCOE is so popular with racers. However, while these factors tend to make
the Weber DCOE carburetor the most popular choice for racing applications, they
are largely irrelevant when building a streetable engine.
Be advised that neither the Weber nor the
Oselli intake manifolds have a balance tube to modulate pressure fluctuations
between the two intake tracts which is necessary to prevent "robbing."
This unmodulated pressure fluctuation, which is aggravated in the individual
intake tracts by the uneven breathing resulting from the 180 degree opposed
throws of the crankshaft, is the reason that these manifolds have no provision
for a vacuum advance takeoff. The advance plate in a vacuum advance distributor
would be rattling back and forth so violently that consistent ignition timing
would be all but impossible to achieve. This is turn forces the use of a pure
centrifugal advance distributor. Expect poor part-throttle response, high
engine temperatures, a tendency to burn valves, a tendency to preignition under
heavy loads, decreased fuel economy, and a ragged idle. On the other hand,
the Cannon 801 intake manifold has provision for the installation of a primitive
balance tube.
There is, however, a considerable difference
between the Weber and the SU in the process of setting them up. The SU
has only one needle and one jet, so you can modify it in your driveway. The
Weber, on the other hand, has a multiple choice of replaceable venturi sizes,
six jets (starter air correction jet, starter jet, idle jet, main jet, accelerator
pump jet, and air correction jet), plus an emulsifier tube! As Peter Burgess
rightly points out in his book, carburetors are rarely properly set up as delivered
(but people rip a Weber out of its package and slap it on their engines in sheer
ignorance of this fact). This multiplicity of jets and venturi sizes does,
however, make it almost infinitely adaptable, even to practically any exotic
camshaft lobe profile, and this is another reason why the factory racing team
used them. They could more easily tailor the engine's performance characteristics
to the type of track that they were about to race on. However, unless
you're using a radical camshaft, have access to a dynamometer, and you really
understand how a carburetor works, take my advice and use the 1 1/2" SU!
The bigger 1 3/4" SUs might make for a bit more power at high engine
speeds (above 6,000 RPM) due to their higher flow capacity, but unless you're
mounting them to meet the demands of either a 1950cc engine with ported heads
or a smaller bore engine with a Piper 285 camshaft and ported heads, you'll
get it at the price of less power at low engine speeds (which is where a street
engine spends most of its operating life), a lumpy, vibrating idle, and difficult
cold weather starting. If you do choose to use them on the aforementioned
engine types, mount them on the Special Tuning intake manifold available from
Burlen Fuel Systems. On a standard displacement engine they will sacrifice
as much power below 4,000 RPM as they will gain above that point.
Don't buy SUs from an aftermarket outlet.
Cut out the money-grubbing middlemen and have Mr. Burgess get them direct
from the Burlen Fuel Systems factory and set them up to fit his headwork, or
buy them yourself at http://www.burlen.co.uk and follow his instructions on
which needle and jet combination to use.
There's another reason to use the SU: aesthetics.
They look right, especially when used with K&N or Original Equipment
aircleaners. The sidedraft Weber DCOE 45 looks as though it's been adapted
and, due to clearance problems, changing the aircleaner element is no fun at
all. Just as the fuel suspended in the incoming fuel/air charge is denser
and heavier than the air, its inertia thus causing it to go towards the outside
of the curved intake manifold, biasing the fuel towards the intake valves of
#1 and #4 cylinders and thus creating a richer mixture for those cylinders,
the intake manifold shape for the downdraft Weber DGV carburetors is actually
even worse. The Weber downdraft DGV 32/36 makes the engine look as though
it was pirated from a Russian tractor. Its usually included adapter manifold
has the flow characteristics of a bathtub with a hole in each side. This
is due to Pierce Manifolds, its distributor, bundling their own poorly designed
intake manifold with the carburetor and selling the resulting package as a kit.
As a result, virtually every example of this combination that I've encountered
or ever heard of had a "flat spot" in the powerband from 1,500 to
2,500 RPM where throttle response was poor. This "flat spot"
can be eliminated by using a Cannon intake manifold instead. However, this will
not eliminate the problems imposed by the restrictive airfilter that Pierce
Manifolds supplies with it in its kit. Its cousin, the Weber downdraft
DGES 38/38, mounts on the same intake manifold and gives more torque at low
engine speeds, but can make the engine difficult to start in cool weather.
If you are refitting a post-1974 single
carbureted engine with dual SU carburetors, be aware that the two carburetor
types, SU HS4 and SU HIF4, use different intake and exhaust manifolds. The
SU HS4 intake manifold can be readily modified for provision for distributor
vacuum takeoff and has a mounting flange thickness of 9/16". In fact,
the intake manifold of the SU HS4-equipped 18GK engine already has this modification.
The HIF4 intake manifold also has provision for distributor vacuum takeoff and
has a mounting flange thickness of 7/16". There are also two different
exhaust manifolds with mounting flange thicknesses that are respectively paired
with these intake manifolds. Should you elect to install a header rather
than an Original Equipment exhaust manifold, be sure to check the thickness
of its flanges before you make your purchase, otherwise you'll be likely to
find yourself fabricating custom half-moon shims!
Also be aware that the advance mechanism
of the distributor used with the pre-1971 North American Market SU HS4 carburetor
takes its vacuum from a connection on the carburetor, while the advance mechanism
of the distributor used with the SU HIF4 carburetor takes its vacuum from the
intake manifold. These two systems result in highly different ignition
advance characteristics. Manifold vacuum continuously varies as the throttle
is being opened. Only when it is wide open is the vacuum at a minimum,
but even then there is still some present because of restrictions in the throat
of carburetor and air cleaner box. It depends on the vacuum capsule specification
as to when vacuum advance ceases to be applied and can be as low as 3in Hg or
as high as 10, depending on which vacuum advance mechanism it uses. Manifold
vacuum cars have maximum vacuum at idle, and hence have maximum advance at idle
because this allows a smaller throttle opening and hence lower emissions for
the same idle speed, at the expense of ease of starting and initial throttle
response. Carburetor or ported vacuum cars have no vacuum at idle and
hence no advance at idle. However, as the throttle opens the vacuum rapidly
increases to become the same as that produced by the gradual fall in vacuum
in manifold vacuum cars. Thereafter they are the same. The pre-1971
North American Market SU HS4 system uses vacuum produced when the throttle opens
to advance the ignition timing, resulting in easier starting and quicker off-throttle
response. The North American Market SU HIF4 system uses manifold vacuum
to advance the ignition timing while the throttle is closed, resulting in harder
starting and slower off-throttle response, but lower exhaust emissions and better
fuel economy while idling. The hard starting problem of this system can
be easily overcome by simply opening the throttle all the way while cranking
the engine. Once the throttle opens, the vacuum is the same on both types.
If you want to use a set of SU HIF4 carburetors while retaining the advantage
of the superior off-throttle response of the SU HS4 ignition advance system,
the UK/European market versions used the ported vacuum of the SU HS4 and can
be ordered Burlen Fuel Systems. Of course, your distributor's ignition
advance mechanism will have to be compatible with whichever version of the vacuum
system you choose to employ.
There has been a great deal of discussion
of the relative merits and vices of the SU HS4 carburetor and those of its successor,
the SU HIF4 carburetor. Advocates of the SU HS4 point out the greater
ease with which the jet can be changed with the carburetor in place on the engine
and the metering advantage of its concentrically mounted needle and jet. Some
feel that its remote float bowl design gives it a "Vintage" appearance.
However, the SU HS4 is not without its vices. It requires the removal
of its aircleaner boxes to enable the use of a special short wrench to effect
mixture adjustment, which results in a richer mixture when the aircleaner boxes
are refitted. It also has a tendency to leak gasoline from its floatbowl
junction. In addition, it has a tendency to run rich or lean under conditions
of rapid acceleration and deceleration, during hard cornering, and when on a
steep road. The SU HIF4 largely addressed these problems by having its
float bowl integral with its body, thus allowing the float to surround the jet
and hence more consistently meter fuel under high angles of tilt and under conditions
of heavy cornering stresses.
Although more time consuming to set up and
more expensive than the SU HS4, the SU HIF4 is easier to adjust and has superior
performance potential due to its higher maximum flow rate which gives somewhat
better performance at high engine speeds. This can be improved by retrofitting
the throttle disks from the earlier pre-1968 SU HS4. These earlier throttle
discs lack the flow-obstructing poppet valve of the later versions and also
greatly improve engine braking, but you will have to file a notch in the bottom
to facilitate airflow to the jet. Replacing both its piston with its biased
needle and its dashpot with the earlier piston with its concentric needle and
a mating dashpot from the pre-1969 SU HS4 (a simple "drop in" parts
swap) improves its long term performance further. Just be sure to refit
the phenolic spacers and heatshield when you install them or the fuel will percolate
in the floatbowls, causing the engine to run lean and all but refuse to restart
after being parked for a while when hot. Should you decide to reuse your
old heatshield, be sure that its insulating pads on the side facing the intake
manifold are in good condition. If they are not, new insulating material
can be obtained at any Speed Shop frequented by the local Hot Rod set. Be
aware that the heatshields used with the SU HS4 carburetors (Victoria British
Part # 10-35) and SU HIF4 carburetors (Victoria British Part # 3-5742) are not
interchangeable.
During routine adjustment its mixture can
be modified from above with nothing more than a simple screwdriver, hence removal
of the aircleaner boxes is not necessary. Its thermosensitive mixture
control makes for easier cold weather starting. Those who have converted
their cars from the SU HS4 to the SU HIF4 usually report a 1 to 2 mpg increase
in fuel economy. Unfortunately, it must be removed from the intake manifold
to change the jet and its thermosensitive mixture adjustment control can cause
it to run lean if underhood temperatures rise badly in heavy traffic on hot
summer days. Consequently, Jet Hot coating of the exhaust manifold is
a worthwhile investment. If you're thinking of replacing a set of worn
Original Equipment SU HIF4 carburetors with a set of SU HS4s because they cost
less, think again. It can be done, but it's not an easy bolt on swap.
You'll need an HS4 heatshield, distributor, cables, plus the linkages
and a lot of other little bits and pieces that aren't commercially available
anymore, so you'll spend a lot of time scrounging around trying to get them.
If it's the lower price of the HS4 that seems attractive, be aware that
when you get through buying all of the hardware necessary to do the installation
correctly, the difference in cost won't be anything like what you hoped it would
be. Whichever version of the SU carburetor you choose, you will find it
helpful to obtain copies of the "SU Reference Catalogue" and "The
SU Workshop Manual" from Burlen Fuel Systems.
To help you get your jetting and needles
spot-on right, you will find an investment in an SU Needle Profile Chart worthwhile.
As I'm sure you're aware, the needle controls the fuel mixture in stages
according to engine speed and vacuum. An engine that's been modified to
breath more deeply will have greater fuel needs as engine speed increases, so
you'll need the right needles to avoid running performance problems. If
you contact Peter Burgess and tell him which camshaft you're using and what
head modifications you have he'll give you the correct needle code number so
you can start the fine-tuning process. The SU Needle Profile Chart will
be invaluable in making the engine sing as it should. Go to the Burlen
Fuel systems website at http://www.burlen.co.uk/ and click on "View our
latest news", then scroll down the page until you come to the yellow words
"Catalogues and merchandise" and click on that. Its item # ALT
9601. Once you've got the carburetion properly fine-tuned you'll be amazed
at how sweetly the engine will run!
The North American Market MGB engine
used four different head castings over the course of its career, all of which
used the same size 1.344" exhaust valve. The first version was used
on the 18G, 18 GA, and 18GB engines, used a 1.565" intake valve, and can
be identified by its head casting number of 12H906. The second version
was used on the 18GF, 18GH, and 18GK engines. It also used the 1.565"
intake valve, was given a slightly improved intake port design and mounting
bosses on the spark plug side of the head for the mounting of air injectors,
and can be identified by its casting number of 12H2389. Both of these
head castings had identical an identical combustion chamber height of 11mm and
a combustion chamber volume of 43cc. The third version of the head, used
on early 18V engines, used larger 1.625" intake valves and revised ports
to produce a bit more power at high engine speeds, although at the expense of
a small loss of torque at low engine speeds. The fourth version of the
head reverted to the original smaller size 1.565" intake valve that was
used on the first two head castings, but had offset oil feed on the rear rocker
stand to accommodate redesigned cooling passages to assist in preventing overheating
of the rear cylinder. This necessitated relocating the oil passage in
the rear rocker shaft stand, which means that if you should choose to install
it on an earlier engine block you're going to need the later rear rocker shaft
stand with the offset oil port. They both have the smaller combustion
chambers of 39cc volume and 10mm combustion chamber height, and can be identified
by their casting numbers which are to be found on the top deck of the head,
underneath the rocker arm cover. These new head castings had coolant passages
with greater surface areas to assist in dealing with the higher combustion chamber
temperatures that resulted from efforts to reduce air pollution. In addition,
the extra material provided created both the indentations behind the spark plug
holes and the mounting bosses provided for mounting air injectors for the exhaust
ports on these head castings, along with a shelf on the edge of the casting
on the same side, had the additional benefit of making them more resistant to
cracking and the blowing of head gaskets due to warpage.
Casting number 12H2923, which uses
the larger intake valve, is commonly found on engines with the engine numbers
18V-584-Z-L, 18V-585-Z-L, 18V-672-Z-L, and 18V-673-Z-L, all of which it was
Original Equipment for. Casting number CAM1106, which uses the smaller
intake valve and the rear rocker stand with the relocated oil feed passage,
is commonly found on engine numbers 18V-797-AE-L, 18V-798-AE-L, 18V-801-AE-L,
18V-836-Z-L, 18V-837-Z-L, 18V-802-AE-L, 18V-883-AE-L, 18V-884-AE-L, 18V-890-AE-L,
and 18V-891-AE-L, all of which it was Original Equipment for. If you are
going to have professional headwork done, specify the earlier large intake valve
and use the latter casting as it is preferable due to its cooler running characteristics.
It will be necessary to fabricate a blanking plate to seal off the outlet
for the water choke fitting exclusive to this head casting.
Be aware that due to their shallower
combustion chambers and lower overall height, if either of these two later heads
are fitted onto the block of any pre-18V engine (18G through 18GK Series), it
will then be necessary to machine recesses into the deck of the block in order
to prevent the exhaust